Opportunity report

Everything feels urgent — lacking a defensible prioritization process

PMs drowning in competing urgent requests (support, sales, revenue bugs) need management buy-in and a defensible prioritization process (RICE, product strategy doc, cost-of-not-doing) to stop reactive firefighting and make trade-offs transparent to stakeholders.

Worth it score 80High confidence5 signals10 evidence
Persona
1 evidence
Product Manager or Product Owner responsible for a product under pressure from support and sales to deliver fixes/features rapidly.

On any given week we have customer support tickets piling up, sales asking for things that are blocking deals, and a couple of bugs that are directly tied to revenue.

view evidence on reddit
Pain
3 evidence
PMs struggle to choose what to work on when customer support tickets, sales-blocking requests, and revenue-related bugs all appear urgent; reacting creates technical debt and broken workflows.

On any given week we have customer support tickets piling up, sales asking for things that are blocking deals, and a couple of bugs that are directly tied to revenue. Everything feels urgent, and saying “this can wait” is hard when someone is waiting on it.

view evidence on reddit

It's not you, it's the organization. If you don't have buy-in from mgmt to move to product driven development, you'll be stuck in that mode.

view evidence on reddit
+1 more evidence

Root cause analysis on support tickets, roadmap for clarity and with sales it’s a priority alignment.

view evidence on reddit
Workaround
3 evidence
Use explicit prioritization frameworks (RICE), build/anchor to a product strategy doc, align stakeholders on costs and impact, assign expected costs/risks to choices and defend decisions with narratives.

As a PO for 7 years I have turned to consistently using RICE. Consistently being the key as it’s very easy to have heart over mind and then confusion spreads with stakeholders and the deliverables drift from the mission.

view evidence on reddit

Do you have a product strategy doc? If not, create one. All of these things are inputs to you forming an opinion on what the most important things to work on.

view evidence on reddit
+1 more evidence

Can you assign costs to it? Short/Mid/Longterm, what happens if you just don't. - Short term: don't loose customers/revenue - mid term: can you have technical 2nd level support to lift weight? - long term: do you

view evidence on reddit
Resistance
2 evidence
Organizational inertia and lack of management buy-in to move from reactive to product-driven development prevents systematic prioritization.

If you don't have buy-in from mgmt to move to product driven development, you'll be stuck in that mode.

view evidence on reddit

The big question if your org wants you to move forward or just react. If your org prioritizes to react it will not be easy to move forward.

view evidence on reddit
Desire
1 evidence
A repeatable, defensible prioritization process and stakeholder alignment that stops firefighting and enables product-driven decisions.

Do you have a product strategy doc? If not, create one. All of these things are inputs to you forming an opinion on what the most important things to work on.

view evidence on reddit
Built by Signal Hunt · Every claim includes traceable evidence.